An Impressive Show: A Tribute to Justice O’Connor

January 1996

An Impressive Show: A Tribute to Justice O’Connor
ITEM DETAILS
Type: Law review article
Author: Judith S. Kaye
Source: Ann. Surv. Am. L.
Citation: 1996 Ann. Surv. Am. L. xxxiv (1996)

Other pages in the O'Connor Institute Online Archive mentioned in this article:

NAME / TITLETYPE
Our Judicial FederalismSpeech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor
The History of the Women's Suffrage MovementSpeech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor
Foreword: First Women: The Contribution of American Women to the LawSpeech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor
"Portia's Progress"Speech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor
Trends in the Relationship Between the Federal and State Courts from the Perspective of a State Court JudgeSpeech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor
The Judiciary Act of 1789 and the American Judicial TraditionSpeech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor
The Quality of JusticeSpeech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor
Juries: They May be Broken, But We Can Fix ThemSpeech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor
Women in PowerSpeech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor

Article Text

(Excerpt)

AN "IMPRESSIVE SHOW': A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE O'CONNOR*

Some time ago, when I happened to answer the telephone in Chambers, a caller said that she was submitting a clerkship application, but had a question: "Does the Judge spell her first name S-ON-D-R-A or S-A-N-D-R-A?" I responded that there was no clerkship vacancy. While I thought in regret a moment later that the confusion was understandable-"Day" and "Kaye," Washington and Albany (both capitals)-in the end, I'm certain it was simply a matter of gender. And in the end it's definitely a privilege to share a gender with Justice Sandra (that's "a" not "o") Day (not "Kaye") O'Connor. The confusion is enormously flattering. In fact, Justice O'Connor herself made light of the phenomenon when she and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg attended a 1993 function wearing T-shirts with "The Supremes" on the front and "I'm Sandra, not Ruth" (and vice versa) on the back. It's hard to believe that Justices O'Connor and Ginsburg are ever mistaken for one another-again, the physical resemblance between the two is hardly striking.1 But there is no question about it. In a day when women are still a rarity in high office, gender remains a defining quality, even within the judicial system. In the course of her distinguished career, Justice O'Connor has encountered, and recounted, instances of gender discrimination. They began with her very entry into the legal profession when, upon graduating near the top of her class at Stanford Law School in 1952,

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please visit Heinonline.org.