O'Connor dissents

June 16, 1983

ITEM DETAILS
Type: Newspaper article
Author: United Press International
Source: Daily Territorial Tucson
NOTE: Due to copyright restrictions, the high-resolution scans and full text of this article are not currently available. The O'Connor Institute will publish that content if and when it receives permission from the copyright holder, Wick Communications. Please contact us at the email address at the bottom of this page with any questions.

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

Article Text

(Excerpt, Automatically generated)

WASHINGTON (UPI) -Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, whose nomination to the nation's highest court was opposed by anti-abortion groups, Wednesday left no doubt that she adamantly opposes abortion. Dissenting from the high court's rulings in three cases, Mrs. O'Connor, 53, squarely backed state limits on abortions and used her chance to write against the majority view as a platform to criticize the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling legalizing abortion. Mrs. O'Connor, the first woman on the high court, disagreed with most of her colleagues who declared an array of state restrictions on obtaining abortions are unconstitutional. Writing the dissent in a case from Akron, Ohio, she said the legislature is the "appropriate forum" for deciding such' 'extremely sensitive issues'' as abortion. Such regulations as requiring abortions after the first three months be performed in a hospital are not "undue burdens" on a woman's rights , she said. The majority, however, disagreed. Nominated to the court by President Reagan, Mrs. O'Connor provided one of only three votes the administration gained in its campaign to persmtde the justices that legistatures should make the final decisions on such politically controversial questions.

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please retrieve it from its original source noted above.