O'Connor silent on abortions

December 3, 1982

ITEM DETAILS
Type: Newspaper article
Author: Elizabeth Olson
Source: Daily Territorial Tucson
NOTE: Due to copyright restrictions, the high-resolution scans and full text of this article are not currently available. The O'Connor Institute will publish that content if and when it receives permission from the copyright holder, Wick Communications. Please contact us at the email address at the bottom of this page with any questions.

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

Article Text

(Excerpt, Automatically generated)

O'Connor stays quiet during court abortion arguments

WASHINGTON (UPI) - With the issue of abortion under consideration in the current Supreme Court term, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor is staying as quiet about her views on the subject as she did at confirmation hearings. Usually quick with questions, Mrs. O'Connor, 52, was silent during the first 35 minutes of oral arguments Tuesday. The first woman ever on the high court, Mrs. O'Connor took her seat in September 1981. Tuesday's three-hour argument was the first she has heard on the abortion question. During Senate confirmation hearings, she steadfastly refused to say if she would repudiate the court's historic 1973 decision legalizing abortion. . Her nomination to the court by President Reagan was warmly received in most quarters, but abortion opponents criticized her stand on the issue during her time as an Arizona legislator. Although she said abortion personally offends her, Mrs. O'Connor told senators she would not oppose allowing abortions to save the woman's life and "possibly" for other reasons. In its 1973 ruling, the Supreme Court said protecting the woman's health wruld justify state regulation of abortions in the second three months of pregnancy. Just how far states can go in !llch regulation is the question before the c,urt in cases from Virginia, Missouri and Akron, Ohio, Not until more than halfway throughthe first case did she speak up. By then, seven of the nine justices had raised questiom. Her first query tried

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please retrieve it from its original source noted above.