Reply to Professor Tarpley's Comment Regarding Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

January 2002

Reply to Professor Tarpley's Comment Regarding Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
ITEM DETAILS
Type: Law review article
Author: Jean Hoefer Toal
Source: South Carolina Law Review
Citation: (Response to Joan Tarpley South Carolina Law Review vol. 53 p. 117 2001) 54 S.C. L. Rev. 267 (2002)

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

Article Text

(Excerpt, Automatically generated)

ESSAY

REPLY TO PROFESSOR TARPLEY' SCOMMENT REGARDING JUSTICE SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR

JEAN HOEFER TOAL•

INTRODUCTION 267

BACKGROUND 268

PROFESSOR TARPLEY'S ATTACK ON JUSTICE O'CONNOR 270

THE EVOLUTION OF THE STRICT SCRUTINY STANDARD FOR EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGES TO RACE-BASED

CLASSIFICATIONS 271

POST-CROSON: METROBROADCASTINGANDADARAND 275

THE IMPACT OF PERSONAL ATTACKS ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE. 279

CONCLUSION 282

INTRODUCTION

The Fall 2001 book of the South Carolina Law Review contains an essay by Joan Tarpley, J.D., Professor of Law at the Walter F. George School of Law, Mercer University entitled,A Comment on Justice O'Connor's Quest for Power and Its Impact on African American Wealth.1 The essay is an overheated, sensational personal attack masquerading under the guise oflegal scholarship. Its thesis is that Justice O'Connor is a white supremacist who, through her opinion in City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.,2 seeks to dismantle affirmative action jurisprudence and strengthen her position as the swing vote on the United States Supreme Court in order to exercise the power of Chief Justice, in fact, if not in name.

Selection to the editorial staff of the South Carolina Law Review in the spring ofmy first year oflaw school remains one of the proudest events ofmy

Chief Justice, Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Joan Tarpley, A Comment on Justice O'Connor's Quest/or Power and Its Impact on African American Wealth, 53 S.C. L. REv. 117 (2001).

  1. 488 U.S. 469 (1989).

267

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please visit Heinonline.org.