The Emerging Jurisprudence of Justice O'Connor

January 1, 1985

ITEM DETAILS
Type: Law review article
Author: Richard A. Cordray & James T. Vradelis student authors
Source: U. Chi. L. Rev.
Citation: 52 U. Chi. L. Rev. 389 (1985)
Notes: Date is approximate

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

Article Text

(Excerpt, Automatically generated)

COMMENTS

The Emerging Jurisprudence of Justice O'Connor

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE ROLE OF THE COURT. 392

"Traditional" Judicial Restraint. 394

Stare Decisis 394

New York v. Quarles

City of Akron v. Akron Center for Repro ductive Health, Inc.

Statutory Construction 403

Immigration & Naturalization Service v.

Phinpathya

Securities Industry Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Bowsher v. Merck & Co.

"Activist" Judicial Restraint. 408

Review of Agencies and Officials 409

Allen v. Wright

Block v. Community Nutrition Institute

Review of Legislation 417

ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Com- mission

Zobel v. Williams

FEDERALISM AND THE COURT 423

Federal Legislation as a Limitation on State Power. 423

Tenth Amendment Limitations on Federal Power 423

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v.

Mississippi

Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority

Federal Preemption of State Legislation 428

389

390 The University of Chicago Law Review

Southland Corp. v. Keating

Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees In ternational Union Local 54

The Federal and State Judiciaries. 430

Exhaustion of State Remedies 430

Rose v. Lundy Engle v. Isaac

Adequate and Independent State Grounds. 433

Michigan v. Long

THE CALCULUS OF INTERESTS: PRIVATE RIGHTS

AND THE AUTHORITY TO GOVERN. 437

Deference to Government Interests: Criminal Procedure 438

Privacy Rights and Law Enforcement 438

United States v. Place Hudson v. Palmer

Double Jeopardy. 443

Thigpen

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please visit Heinonline.org.