By Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

"Why Judges Wear Black Robes" in Smithsonian magazine

November 1, 2013

Type: Magazine article
Source: Smithsonian, November 2013

Article Text


Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on Why Judges Wear Black Robes
The Supreme Court icon breaks down the tradition
By Sandra Day O'Connor
Smithsonian magazine,
November 2013.

The simple black judicial robe has been a part of my life for nearly four decades. I first wore one in 1975 when I became a trial judge in Arizona. When I was appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States, in 1981, I brought that same robe with me to Washington and wore it on my first day on the bench. Although I retired in 2006, I still wear a robe in my role as a “circuit-rider,” sitting frequently , as many retired justices do, on various federal Courts of Appeals across the country.

It is surprising to me how little we know about where this plain black judicial uniform comes from. Colonial judges in England wore robes, and the tradition took off on American soil as well. But English judges also wore colorful robes and ornate wigsa tradition that was not adopted in the United States. Some speculate that the Supreme Court began with more colorful attire; the courts official portrait of the first chief justice, John Jay, shows him in a robe of black and red with white borders. The story, perhaps apocryphal, is that Thomas Jefferson himself objected to such unnecessary pomp: As an ardent supporter of modest republican citizenship, Jefferson was against any needless official apparel, especially the monstrous wig which makes the English judges look like rats peeping through bunches of oakum. It is

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Speech / Interview / Article by Justice O'Connor constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please visit